George Floyd & the Invitation to Ask Unsettling Questions
George Floyd2.jpg

The raw, unedited 8-minute and 46-second video of George Floyd’s death is horrifying and heartbreaking and appalling. Ahmaud Arbery was shot while running in a predominately white neighborhood.

Whatever those particular cases reveal about racism in America, we can and should acknowledge this: racism is not dead in America. Not even close.

In the aftermath of a significant uptick of white supremacy in our country which culminated in Charlottesville in August 2017, I wrote “On Race and the Gospel: Pastoral Reflections”. Many of those scriptural and theological truths should be reiterated again during these days.

The last couple of days feels like the aftermath of Rodney King on steroids. Just as nobody is defending the horrific manner of George Floyd’s gratuitous death, it is likewise (rather) easy to agree that the looting (stolen merchandise) and the burning of businesses in city centers from Minneapolis to Atlanta to Los Angeles are acts of violence that do not honor the memory of George Floyd. In the midst of it all, there are peaceful protestors expressing genuine hurt, frustration, despair, and anger over racial injustice that is intertwined in a long, complex social history of racism in our country.

More is Needed than Virtue Signaling

Virtue signaling is defined by the Oxford dictionary as “the action or practice of publicly expressing opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue”.  Social media is a breeding ground of virtue signaling. With a few clicks and shares, you can be sure you are always on “the right side” of any particular moral issue while signaling to others your impeccable moral character. Racism in my life? “Please, haven’t you seen my moral outrage via my posts on social media?” More will be needed than virtue signaling in the days (and years) ahead if America is to heal one of its foremost collective sins. (For more on virtue signaling read here, with a counter-point here.)

Share the Pain

Rev. Dr. David Lenz is a friend and an ECO pastor-colleague working in Minneapolis. After Minneapolis pastors came together via a video call, Lenz reflects thus:

I listened as one of my friends and colleagues, a prominent African American leader, someone I have laughed with and shared meals with, someone I admire greatly, someone who has preached at Hope Church, shared his pain. 

Through his tears, he wanted us to know how this experience feels to him and the black community. The horrific public death of George Floyd, a death that never should have happened, for which there cannot be any shred of justification, is not an isolated event. Rather, it is part of a shameful pattern that reaches back across American history for something like 400 years.

He wanted us to know that it is precisely because such deaths keep happening that there is such despair, such questioning of systems and structures that have not protected African Americans from lynching and brutality. (I thought of my visit with him in 2018 to the National Memorial for Peace and Justice in Montgomery, Alabama - an extraordinary place, where 800 steel structures list the names of lynching victims from every county in the United States where they have taken place.)

Most of all, he wanted to know if white Christians will come alongside black Christians and the black community, to stand with them in their pain, to be willing to name the evils of racism (and the often implicit ways racism continues to infect and impact us), and to work together for a better future.

A question white Christians should be asking during these days is this: what does it mean for me to (better) understand the pain of the black community? To stand with them in their pain? To begin, through empathy and through action, to share the pain? Folks might point out the impossibility of complete solidarity or the impossible task of fully sharing the pain of another. Yet even if solidarity is always approximate and burden-bearing never bears the full load, the trust and good-will and intentionality present in such movement towards others who are not like you is often appreciated and respected, even if you (and me) will be corrected at times and continue to learn through the journey.

Ask the Question “What is Racism?” and Let the Question come Home to Roost

The paradox of racism in America is that almost nobody believes themselves to be a racist…yet racism is prevalent in our country. How can this be? Part of the problem why this Gordian knot is extremely difficult to unravel is our inability to even agree on a simple definition of racism.

Conservatives tend to define racism in terms of personal, concrete behaviors; progressives tend to define racism in terms of social and structural systems. Much of America talks past each other on issues of race because we are starting the conversation from such distinct vantage points.

In general, white conservatives tend to define racism in such narrow terms that the definition itself often serves only to insulate them from any implicit participation in the societal structures of racism. With a narrow definition of racism in place, only egregious and heinous and personal concrete actions are considered racist and thus most white conservatives are never forced to look in the mirror and let the question of racism come home to roost in their own lives (i.e. “I haven’t lynched anyone” or “I haven’t purposely discriminated against anyone…so I’m fine”).

I wonder whether defining away the problem is part of the problem. 

I’m not advocating a militant pendulum swing (i.e. “all white people are racist” or “all white people should be plagued by white guilt”). Complex issues deserve proper nuance rather than visceral sound bites. Yet if we define away the problem of racism such that nobody ever really participates in racism, then we haven’t traveled very far down the path towards hope and healing.

Unsettling times calls for unsettling questions: let the question of racism come home to roost in your own life. Therein lies the beginning of the journey.

Jason Carter
A Prayer for our Country on Pentecost Sunday May 31, 2020
Black and White.jpg

As Trinity pre-recorded its service earlier in the week, please pray with me for our country in this Pastoral Prayer for May 31, 2020:

Lord, have mercy. 

Christ, have mercy.

Lord, have mercy.

How long, O Lord, how long will racism ravage our hearts and our communities?

How long, O Lord, how long will African-American young men fear for their lives?    

How long, O Lord, how long will structures of racism prevail in our cities, neighborhoods, and schools?

How long, O Lord, how long will these protests-turned-riots perpetuate senseless acts of vandalism and violence?

Give wisdom, O Lord, give wisdom to police, mayors, governors, and the federal government.

Give solidarity, O Lord, give solidarity between Christians of all races that the church might be a harbinger of the Kingdom of Heaven where every tribe and language and people and nation gather around the throne of the Lamb who was slain.

Christ, for these acts of racism, you died. For these acts of violence, you died. For the reconciliation of brothers and sisters of different races, you died.

Lord, we praise you that the image of God is stamped upon each and every human life. Lord, we praise you that the image of God is perfectly found in every race and ethnicity and that the diversity of ethnicities and races and languages serves to magnify your excellent greatness.  

We praise you, O Lord, that you are a God that brings hope out of despair, peace in the midst of chaos, reconciliation out of strife, and justice in the midst of violence. Lord, we ask that your Holy Spirit be poured out in abundance on Pentecost Sunday. In the name of Jesus Christ, we pray. Amen.

*****

In the aftermath of a significant uptick of white supremacy in our country which culminated in Charlottesville in August 2017, I wrote “On Race and the Gospel: Pastoral Reflections”. Many of those scriptural and theological truths can be reiterated again during these days.

Jason Carter
Should our church live stream the Lord's Supper?
Communion.jpg

Our church has not celebrated the Lord’s Supper since the first week of March.

Theologians and churches have reacted in diverse manners to this online hiatus with regards to the Lord’s Supper. The Gospel Coalition has published a pro/con on the issue from two baptistic perspectives, one encouraging the practice of an online Lord’s Supper and one denying that the Lord’s Supper should be celebrated apart from a gathered assembly. An article in Christianity Today embraces “online Communion” with a cheeky subtitle: “The bread and the cup Zoomed for you”. G.P. Wagenfuhr, ECO’s Theology Coordinator, makes a theologically robust plea against online communion, as does Scott R. Swain, President of Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando.

First of all, we must place this issue on our theological radar as a “third-tier theological issue”. Non-negotiables of the Christian faith are first-tier theological doctrines like the Trinity and the incarnation. If a person cannot hold an orthodox belief in the Trinity or that Jesus became human (the incarnation), then we can reasonably assume these issues represent a stark dividing line between belief and unbelief. All major branches of Christianity (Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant, and Pentecostal) affirm these first-tier theological issues of Trinity and incarnation.

Yet, we are not either treading on what we might call “second-tier” theological issues such as our Reformed view of Soteriology (doctrine of salvation). As a Presbyterian church in the Reformed family of churches, our tradition has historic roots in the Protestant Reformation, itself founded on a solid exegetical foundation of sola scriptura (Scripture alone). Thus, Presbyterians have historically embraced the Reformed “doctrines of grace”: election based on the decree of God (Eph. 1:4-5), salvation not by human choice but by the grace of God (Eph. 2:8-9) since we were dead in our trespasses and sins (Eph. 2:1) and thus God had to act in Christ to make us alive (Eph. 2:5). Only God’s saving grace can awaken (unto salvation) men and women dead in sin.

The issue of an online Lord’s Supper is a third-tier theological issue where you will find good Christians on both sides of the theological divide (e.g. baptism, eschatology, forms of church government). There are good, faithful churches practicing a lament-like abstinence from the Lord’s Supper during the online hiatus while other good, faithful churches dive into the deep end of virtual church by celebrating the Lord’s Supper online.

Here’s a few reasons (biblically, theologically, and confessionally) why I am hesitant to celebrate the Lord’s Supper online.

(1)   Biblical Reason: Instructions in 1 Corinthians 11 emphasize the Lord’s Supper should take place with the gathered church.

1 Corinthians 11:17-33 represent Paul’s most important instructions for celebrating the Lord’s Supper. In this teaching passage of Paul to the Corinthian church, the apostle mentions on five different occasions the importance of coming together as a church to celebrate the sacrament:

  • 1 Cor. 11:17 – …when you come together…

  • 1 Cor. 11:18 – …when you come together as a church…

  • 1 Cor. 11:20 – When you come together…

  • 1 Cor. 11:33 – …when you come together…

  • 1 Cor. 11:34 – …when you come together…

Scott Swain puts it succinctly: “When it comes to the Lord’s Supper, then, no shared meal, no covenant assembly, means no sacrament.” Biblically, the physical gathering of the body of Christ to share the meal together is a fundamental and indispensable part of celebrating the Lord’s Supper.

A sacrament is a means of grace ordained by Christ that bestows the promise of the presence and blessing of God. The nature of baptism connotes initiation while the Lord’s Supper connotes participation and communion. In 1 Cor. 10:16-17, Paul writes:

“The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”

The mystery of “participation” and “communion” in the Lord’s Supper is not simply vertical in nature (communion with God) but also horizontal (the mystery of spiritual unity in the gathered church). From the one bread, the gathered many are united mysteriously together spiritually as the body of Christ, the church.

As G.P. Wagenfuhr writes, “We cannot be united in the body of Christ if we are not together in the body.”

(2)   Theological Reason: Biblical spirituality is incarnational in nature.

Spirituality without incarnation is gnosticism.

Gnosticism was an early ancient heresy that threatened the early church with a belief that emphasized the spirit to the exclusion of the body. An overly simplistic summary of gnosticism is: body = bad; spirit = good. Gnosticism sought to divorce the Christian faith from the earthiness of God’s creation and the fleshly, bodily, incarnation of Christ. Whether or not John was writing specifically against incipient gnostic tendencies of the early church, John 1:14 is a seminal text that celebrates and magnifies the kind of “incarnational spirituality” that becomes central to New Testament faith: “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us…” (John 1:14a). Paul celebrates the bodily resurrection (1 Cor. 15) and portrays the church as a body (Rom. 12:4-5, 1 Cor. 12:27; Eph. 4:4; Col. 1:18, 24).

The New Testament’s view of Christ, of the church, and of the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper are inter-connected and deeply incarnational in nature. The central NT metaphor for the church as “the body of Christ” and the Lord’s Supper which remembers the body and blood of Jesus in gathered worship point decidedly away from “excarnation” (out of the flesh) and unequivocally towards “incarnation” (in the flesh). (For more, see Wagerfuhr.) An online Lord’s Supper, which primarily promotes the spirituality of the sacrament in a disembodied fashion from the gathered body of Christ, is gnostic in its orientation.

While some might argue for online Communion because Reformed Christians historically believe that Christ is “spiritually present” when we celebrate the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, the context of Christ’s spiritual presence thru the sacrament is embedded in an embodied, corporeal, and incarnational gathering of the body of Christ.

True spirituality is incarnational: Jesus Christ came and dwelt among us (John 1:14). In all its divine mystery, the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper communicates to us this massive and essential truth that the presence and blessing of God is embodied (not disembodied) and corporeal (not ethereal).

(3)   Confessional Reason: Online Communion essentially promotes the practice of a Private Communion, which is antithetical to the nature of the sacrament.

Historical creeds have shaped the praxis and theology of Reformed churches as reliable and historic expositions of the Word of God. The Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 27, Paragraphs 3-4 reads:

iii. The Lord Jesus hath, in his ordinance, appointed His ministers to declare His word of institution to the people; to pray, and bless the elements of bread and wine, and thereby to set them apart from a common to an holy use; and to take and break bread, to take the cup and (they communicating also themselves) to give both to the communicants; but to none who are not then present in the congregation. 

iv. Private masses, or receiving this sacrament by a priest, or any other, alone, as likewise, the denial of the cup to the people, worshipping the elements, the lifting them up, or carrying them about, for adoration, and the reserving them for any pretended religious use; are all contrary to the nature of this sacrament, and to the institution of Christ.

Commenting on the Westminster Assembly, Reformed Theological Seminary professor Chad B. Van Dixhoorn writes:

The last line of the third paragraph specifies that the Lord's supper is not to be received privately. One reason why the Westminster assembly frowned on bringing the bread and wine to persons not present in the worship service, was presented in paragraph one: this meal is intended to celebrate communion with Christ, but also with fellow Christians.

A second related reason why the Westminster assembly disapproved of private communion is found in the Bible itself: not only did the individualistic approach of the Corinthians earn an apostolic rebuke (1 Cor. 11:20; c.f., 17-22), it seems to have been the settled pattern of the first Christians to 'gather together to break bread' rather than to eat in isolation (e.g., Acts 20:7). 

If my wife asks me to celebrate the Lord’s Supper with our boys on a special Christian holiday, my answer would be the same: the sacrament is meant be celebrated in the church. The sacrament is not to be privatized. The sacrament is not meant to be individualized. Representatives of the church may go to hospitals or nursing homes only as an extension of the church for those incapable of physically participating in the sacrament. When the entire gathered church is in exile, the sacrament is not rightly celebrated.

Yet someone might say: “Does not Jesus say, ‘For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them’? (Mt. 18:20) Therefore, two or three is the church! So let’s celebrate online communion in homes during the pandemic.”

The succinct reply is that Mt. 18:20 is one of the most misinterpreted and misapplied verses in the entire New Testament. Jesus is referring to admonishing or rebuking a brother caught in sin:

If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. (Mt. 20:15-16)

The context is not a private prayer meeting. Nor is Jesus giving the definitive criteria for what constitutes the ekklesia (church). Modern evangelicals, in misapplying Mt. 18:20, often ask the verse to carry an outlandish amount of ecclesiological freight it was never intended to support.

What is our Response?

In the life of the church, there are seasons of feasting and seasons of fasting. In the Psalter, there are praise psalms and lament psalms. “There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under the heavens...A time to weep and a time to laugh, a time to mourn and a time to dance.” (Ecc. 3:1,3)

As exiles from the gathered church, congregations are learning to fast, to lament, and to mourn.

G.P. Wagenfuhr expresses our contemporary situation well: “Scripture is full of examples of people who were forcibly separated from the presence of God and other believers:

Paul longed for churches while he was imprisoned.

The Israelites lost the Ark of the Covenant when Saul misused it, thus losing the symbol of the presence of God.

The Israelites lost the temple, and the presence of God in their midst when they went into Babylonian Exile.

In each of these situations the people lamented. They did not try to cope by simulating what was lost.” 

Lamenting, fasting, and mourning can be soul-food, too.

**********

See also: The Dark Side for the Church during its Online Hiatus.

Jason Carter
Is Waiting "The Worst Thing Ever"? Reflections on Psalm 62
Psalm 62: For God alone my soul waits in silence | from him comes my salvation. 2 He alone is my rock and my salvation, | my fortress; I shall not be greatly shaken. 3 How long will all of you attack a man | to batter him, like a leaning wall, a tot…

Psalm 62: For God alone my soul waits in silence | from him comes my salvation. 2 He alone is my rock and my salvation, | my fortress; I shall not be greatly shaken. 3 How long will all of you attack a man | to batter him, like a leaning wall, a tottering fence? 4 They only plan to thrust him down from his high position. They take pleasure in falsehood. | They bless with their mouths, but inwardly they curse. 5 For God alone, O my soul, wait in silence, | for my hope is from him. 6 He only is my rock and my salvation, | my fortress; I shall not be shaken. 7 On God rests my salvation and my glory; | my mighty rock, my refuge is God. 8 Trust in him at all times, O people; | pour out your heart before him; God is a refuge for us. 9 Those of low estate are but a breath; | those of high estate are a delusion; in the balances they go up; | they are together lighter than a breath. 10 Put no trust in extortion; | set no vain hopes on robbery; if riches increase, set not your heart on them. 11 Once God has spoken; | twice have I heard this: that power belongs to God, 12 and that to you, O Lord, belongs steadfast love. For you will render to a man according to his work.

Guest Post: Lisa Carter

The COVID-19 crisis has shaken the world, and now we wait. Some of us wait for the day in the Fall when we feel safe to send our children to school. We wait to return to our jobs, if we still have one. Some wait for a stimulus or unemployment check. Others of us are waiting to gather with loved ones and families and our church family. We wait for the freedom to visit our favorite restaurants, coffee shops, and businesses. We wait for the services and interventions for our special needs children. We wait for surgeries or dental or medical appointments that are not deemed essential right now.

Others of us wait for test results. We wait for family members to recover. We wait to grieve the loss of a loved one within our community. We wait and wonder how many more will get the virus. How many more will die? How long the quarantine will last? We wait. Waiting is never easy.  As Tom Petty sang, “waiting is the hardest part.”

It’s not our habit to wait. We are a culture of immediacy.  With all our technological advancements, we’ve become a less patient people. Coupled with our Do-It-Yourself fixer-upper mentality, we find it hard to wait and depend on anyone or anything outside of our own control.

Spiritual Waiting

Spiritually, it’s also hard to wait. Dr. Larry Crabb writes, “It is not our habit to wait on a hidden God who is somehow working a masterful plan to bring glory to Himself.” 

Even with plenty of things to keep us distracted, waiting can still be a scary and painful process. Yet, waiting is actually good for us all. To miss the goodness of waiting is to miss what waiting does to refine and grow us. There is always purpose in waiting. Abraham and Sarah waited 75 years for their promised son. Israel waited 420 years for deliverance from Egypt, then another 40 years before they could enter the Promised Land. God’s people waited generation after generation for the Messiah, and the church now awaits Christ’s return.

The question “How Long?” is a question that hovers over many of the Psalms.

In the waiting, here’s the key question: what does it look like to wait in a way that makes us a participant in what God is doing rather than someone who struggles against the wait and His purposes in it?

After all, we can be assured, as John Piper recently shared, that “the same sovereignty that could stop the coronavirus, yet doesn’t, is the very sovereignty that sustains the soul in it.” God could stop this pandemic at any time, but in His mysterious wisdom chooses to let us wait for His purposes. So how do we wait well?

A Biblical Resource for our Waiting

I believe that Psalm 62 can be an encouragement to us in the waiting.

This is a psalm attributed to David. Some scholars think that David wrote this psalm in the middle of facing the rebellion of his son, Absalom, though it’s not certain. Whatever the case, throughout his entire life David seemed to face formidable enemies whether it be Goliath, his own mentor Saul, his own son Absalom, the Philistines, and especially temptations from his own flesh and the sin within. 

We cannot relate to many of the experiences David faced but we do have an enemy we are fighting right now as a nation. It’s an “invisible enemy” as people in our government have called it. Our enemy is COVID-19 which is life-threatening and threatening our very way of life, but we also face the enemies of our doubts and fears that attack our minds. 

What does David do when he is surrounded by enemies as expressed in this psalm?  He does something so counter-intuitive to us as modern Americans. He stops. He ceases action. He goes silent. He waits.

David’s Waiting

Right in the midst of all that is going on around him David begins with a calm composure and a silent waiting based on submission to his God (vs. 1: “For God alone my soul waits in silence”). He doesn’t grumble or complain or scheme but waits on the only source of hope that he knows. He says his waiting is in God alone

Charles Spurgeon describes this kind of waiting as a possession of the soul until deliverance comes. He says to wait on God is worship.  To wait in this posture is to give up the notion that we can do anything to save ourselves. It requires a kind of faith that nothing can shake us.

How could David silently wait instead of taking action or fretting, grumbling or complaining when enemies were upon him? And how do we sit and wait in submissive silence for deliverance in the midst of a global pandemic? To find the answer in this psalm, we must ask ourselves two questions:

Who do we Trust?

We wait quietly because of our trust in the One we wait upon.  We can wait assuredly upon God because He is our rock (vs. 2, 6), our salvation (vs. 2, 6), our fortress (vs. 2, 6), our refuge (vs. 7, 8).  He is all powerful (vs. 11) and possesses steadfast love (vs. 11).

We put our trust in Him because He alone is our greatest hope and the only perfectly trustworthy one.  Our ultimate hope in the waiting is not in our own plans, our googled information, our government, our medical experts, our economists, or even our first responders as important as these institutions and people may be. Our hope is in our Sovereign Loving God and it ought to be Him that we wait upon for our salvation and deliverance. He alone is the only one who can deliver from us from any enemy.

This leads us to another question that begs to be asked: are we waiting for everything to go back to the way things were?  Are we waiting for health, ease, comfort, and peace?  What are we waiting for?

What do we wait for? What do we hope for?

There is something at the end of our waiting. Most people feel that waiting is meaningless without an end result. Right now, we wait for an end to a global pandemic.

Yet, as we look to the counsel of Scripture, it appears that the process of waiting is as important as the end result to God.

As Paul Tripp puts it, “waiting is not about what you get at the end; it’s about what you become as you wait.” Or, as Jade Mazarin writes: “Something actually happens while nothing is happening. God uses waiting to change us.”

From the whole counsel of God’s Word, we know God’s ultimate purpose is that God be enjoyed and glorified in and through us. Paul writes: “It is my eager expectation and hope that…Christ will be magnified in my body, whether by life or by death” (Phil. 1:20)

Waiting is a tool of God to shape and mold and refine us into vessels of His mercy if we submit to Him through the process. We exist for God’s glory, not our own comfort and ease. Paul Tripp writes, “The whole redemptive story is written for one purpose and one purpose alone: the glory of the king.” Tripp believes that the reason that waiting is so hard is “because we tie our hearts to other glories.”

In Psalm 62, David points out man’s attachment to the glories of riches and power. God often strips us of our glories in our seasons of waiting. Waiting requires us to surrender to His glory.

Since we live in a fallen and broken world, it is inevitable that we wait. You will often find yourself in a “season of waiting”. In the waiting, will you build bigger and more solid bridges of trust in God? Will you surrender more fully to a Sovereign God who continues to possess perfect steadfast love even in the midst of a global pandemic?

Will you use your season of waiting to trust more fully in God alone? 

Jason Carter
The Dark Side for the Church during its Online Hiatus
Online coronavirus pic.jpg

There are voices in the larger evangelical world that are finding the silver lining, and even celebrating, the shift of American Christianity en masse to online worship services. Attractional church growth guru, Carey Nieuhwhof, has claimed, with much enthusiasm, that “church growth” spiked 300% last month as people began sitting on couches and around kitchen tables on Sunday mornings.

I’m highly skeptical.

In my mind, any fruitful metric of “church growth” which is exclusively tied to digital content ceases to have much legitimacy. Neiuhwhof champions the idea that online worship removes the obstacles to church attendance because “church” is simply a click away and therefore “digital church has a much lower barrier to participation”.  The problem is that “participation” of online worship lowers the bar to such an extent as to beg the question of whether this “church” is attracting consumers (to digital content) or raising up worshipers (of the Triune God).

As Mike Frost writes, “If you’re winning people to a ten or fifteen minute viewing of a prepackaged worship and teaching experience, devoid of community, mission, correction, reconciliation or justice, you’re not growing the church. You’re fostering religious consumers.”

Online Worship Church

We already live in a cultural moment where a person kayaks on the river or takes a run on the beach on a Sunday morning and posts a picture to Instagram with #church. Evangelicalism’s long confused love affair with its muddled ecclesiology seems to be at a potential tipping point during the coronavirus crisis. Tim Challies asks, “If we all stream our services, will anyone ever come back?” The fact that this is now a question reveals evangelicalism’s shaky foundation: the church’s orientation has been inverted with man at the center, as churches bend over backwards to “attract new customers” with exciting content, quick fixes for felt needs, and instant community.

You might notice from the outset that TWC has labeled its online hiatus an “online worship experience”.  No mention is made of the word “church”. Because what we are trying to simulate during these days is just that – a simulation of the real thing. We would be wise not to confuse the simulation with the real thing or believe that the simulation could ever replace the actual.

A church that worships the Triune God recognizes that humanity was made for relational connection (God is Father, Son, & Holy Spirit).  Disciples who follow the Incarnate One are meant to incarnate truth and grace in a community of real relationships. An individualized, fuzzy spirituality devoid of the body of Christ is not a recipe for church but for navel-gazing “experience-ism”, an increasingly common and cheap substitute for church in our particular moment in time.

Participation or Consumption?

From sizing up my own “participation” of online worship and hearing about the experiences of others, the axiom “the medium is the message” seems dangerously close to reality. On our TV or computers, we are accustomed to short bursts of engagement thru constantly searching for (entertaining or educational) content that suits our fancy. Our attention is minimal and the engagement is impersonal. We can hide behind a screen where we are never fully known. We pause the service as kids or pets or more exciting content (perhaps on a second device?) interrupt our disengaged participation again and again.

Sure, wearing pajamas to “church” seems like a cool idea until you filter this participation thru the prophet Isaiah’s weighty encounter with the holiness of Yahweh (in Isaiah 6) or meditate on the beloved disciple John falling down “as though dead” before the glory of God in his magnificent vision of God (Rev. 1:17).

I, for one, won’t be celebrating our pivot to online worship services but practicing lament as the body of Christ grieves a significant loss.

*****

See also: During a time of disorientation and canceled gatherings, what might God be teaching the Church during COVID-19? Leaning into these few, precious opportunities could prove immensely fruitful: “Opportunities for the Church during its Online Hiatus”.

Jason Carter
Opportunities for the Church during its Online Hiatus
back to our roots.jpg

Online church is not church.

Let’s get that straight from the get-go. (We’ll delve deeper into that reality with the next post “The Dark Side for the Church during its Online Hiatus”.) 

Yet even in the hardest of times, God is a God who habitually brings life out of death, light out of darkness, and triumph and strength out of times of conflict and weakness. So what could be the positive effects on the church during its online hiatus due to COVID-19?

PUTTING FAITH BACK INTO THE FAMILY

The church is meant to play a secondary role in the spiritual nurture and intentional discipleship of our children and students. The priority of the family in faith formation is a long-standing God-ordained way the faith is passed to the next generation.

In Israel, families practiced the daily recitation of the Shema (Shema  שְׁמַ֖ע is derived from the first word “hear” of Deut. 6:4-9). The Shema begins with the confession of Yahweh alone being their God and Israel being a monotheistic people:

Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Deut. 6:4

The Shema proceeds to the central commandment to love Yahweh. (“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might” Deut. 6:5.)

Yet, quite noticeably, the context of this instruction to love Yahweh occurs not in the Tabernacle, nor in the future-built Temple, nor in the Holy City of Jerusalem but in the midst of family life. (Read Deut. 6:6-9!)

No mention is made of the priests. No mention of a sanctuary. No mention of Sunday school or youth group.

Faithful Israelites are given a holy and solemn charge: “You shall teach them [God’s words/commandments] diligently to your children.” Where? “In your house.” When? “When you lie down and when you rise.” The command implicitly charges Israel’s fathers and mothers: you need to get equipped to be the primary teachers of the faith to your children.

Not surprisingly, in the New Testament, God charges leaders in the church, including pastors and teachers, “to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ” (Eph. 4:12). Pastors and teachers are called to equip; the saints (meaning all Christians, including fathers and mothers) are called to carry out “the work of ministry”.  

If you feel ill-equipped in the discipleship of your child, then you should beat down the door of the teachers and pastors of your church so they can disciple you in the faith until you are equipped for this life-defining work. Christian parents need to get well-acquainted with the Bible (reading the Word), sound Christian doctrine (knowledge of the Word), and spiritual practices (the rhythms & habits that nurture faith) to pass on the faith onto their children. 

As COVID-19 strips away the gathered church, faith has an opportunity to flourish in its God-ordained setting – in the context of the family.[1]

Key Question: Are the spiritual rhythms and habits you are currently practicing during COVID-19 able to sustain, by the grace of God, your child’s faith into adulthood? 

EXCHANGING CONSUMER CHRISTIANITY FOR SIMPLER VERSIONS OF CHURCH

I love what Brett McCracken writes: “In the COVID-19 quarantine, the clunky, unpolished computer-church experience will decidedly not be the easiest or most comfortable option for how people spend their Sundays. It will be a countercultural choice. And that’s a good thing.” 

Even in our denomination, one of the largest churches in ECO (with a paid media team) has experienced technical problems during COVID-19 that resulted in many people not being able to participate in its Sunday morning worship.

During COVID-19, we have to remember that the Christian faith is predominantly thriving in places on our planet (like Africa & Latin America) that are most removed from the consumer-driven metrics that characterize the western church. Could it be that the simple biblical gospel does not need to be adorned by electric guitars and fast-paced activities for children and youth? 

Key Question: Are you being a consumer or a worshiper during COVID-19? What can you learn about the simplicity of the faith during these days of quarantine?

Giving “UNTO GOD” rather than for (consumer) SERVICES-RENDERED

Many churches have been scrambling to piece together emergency budgets and dramatically cut costs during a downshift of congregational giving as church services have moved online.

Will the coronavirus teach the American church that giving, first and foremost, is a God-centered activity that honors God rather than being a horizontal, transactional activity that gives for “services rendered”?  If our giving is in proportion to “how happy I am with my church” or “how wonderful the music is” or “how good the preacher performs”, then we have succumbed to a very human-centered transaction in our giving. 

Ironically, as the church moves online, online giving has the potential to depict  something beautiful about the nature of giving itself.  Whether the person is present (or not) in worship during a given weekend or whether the church is meeting face-to-face (or not) during the coronavirus, giving is primarily meant to be an expression of our worship of God.  Primarily, congregational giving is to be found on the Godward side of life, with a God-centered direction in its basic orientation.  

Key Question: Is my giving “unto the Lord” or for (consumer) “services rendered”?

A Word of Hope

The coronavirus is shaking up our world in enormous ways. Wouldn’t it be great if the church could emerge from this shake-up with more resolute father and mothers convinced of the necessity to teach the faith in the home? If the church began to be filled with Christians less beholden to and less impressed with the consumer-driven circumference of the faith and more fixed upon the Jesus as the center of the faith?  

There are positive possibilities for the church. Let those who have ears to hear and eyes to see, lean into a Jesus-centered, family-nurtured, simple gospel that awakens our hearts and prepares our souls to journey through even the hardest of times in our world.

*****

[1] As a church, TWC is providing a “Living Room Liturgy” that, quite honestly, might be more important during these days for your family than the actual online service because fathers and mothers can “incarnate” the faith in a discussion based on actual knowledge of your own children’s faith needs. You can pray with and over your children. Even the simple action of seeing mom or dad opening their Bibles intentionally at home can leave long-lasting impressions on children for the rest of their lives.

Note: “Living Room Liturgy” is found on the “Online Worship Experience” on the TWC website.

Jason Carter